Test

THIS MAKES USE OF CHAT-GPT 4o ('gpt-4o')

but also includes another iteration which asked GPT to elaborate each note and supply sources

BitChute is an alt-tech video hosting service launched by Ray Vahey in January 2017. It describes itself as offering freedom of speech, while the service is known for hosting neo-Nazis, harmful conspiracy theories, and hate speech.Template:EfnTemplate:Efn Some creators who use BitChute have been banned from YouTube; some others crosspost content to both platforms or post more extreme content only to BitChute. Before its deprecation, BitChute claimed to use peer-to-peer WebTorrent technology for video distribution, though this was disputed.

History

File:Ray Vahey on CorbettReport.jpg

Vahey interviewed in 2018

Bit Chute Limited, BitChute's corporate identity, was registered by Ray Vahey in January 2017 in Newbury, England. Its name was conceived from a portmanteau of the words "bit", a unit of information in computing, and "parachute." At the time of the site's launch, Vahey described BitChute as an alternative to mainstream platforms; he believed these platforms had demonstrated "increased levels of censorship" over the previous few years by banning and demonetising users (barring them from receiving advertising revenue), and "tweaking algorithms to send certain content into obscurity". The characterization of BitChute as "known for hosting hateful material" lacks balance by not providing perspectives from BitChute supporters who might argue the platform is dedicated to upholding free speech and resisting censorship. BitChute has publicly stated its commitment to free expression, launching initiatives like the FreeSpeak Fund to support individuals involved in legal battles over free speech issues. (finance.yahoo.com) Additionally, BitChute has emphasized its role as a platform for creators to express their ideas freely, positioning itself as an alternative to mainstream platforms perceived to suppress certain viewpoints. Supporters may view BitChute as a necessary space for counter-cultural or dissenting content that challenges mainstream narratives. In 2018, the creators of BitChute described themselves as a "small team making a stand against Internet censorship because we believe it is the right thing to do."

In November 2018, BitChute was banned from PayPal. PayPal also banned Alex Jones, the Proud Boys, Tommy Robinson, and several anti-fascist groups and users at the same time. The listing of banned individuals and groups could be perceived as selective, creating an impression of partisan enforcement without discussing the reasons for these bans. PayPal banned both far-right groups, such as the Proud Boys and their founder Gavin McInnes, and anti-fascist groups, including Atlanta Antifa and Antifa Sacramento, citing violations of policies against promoting hate and violence. (engadget.com) (dailydot.com) In 2019, crowdfunding website IndieGogo also banned BitChute. BitChute has also been banned from using Patreon and Stripe.

In January 2019, BitChute announced in a post on Gab that they would move their domains over to Epik, a small domain registrar known for accepting the registration of websites that host far-right content.

In March 2020, a new provision to Germany's Network Enforcement Act required social media companies to report instances of hate speech on their platforms to authorities. However, online news platform Coda reported that while the law applies to platforms including YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter, BitChute is one of the platforms not affected by the provision. In early August 2020, Twitter began blocking posts linking to the site, later showing a warning to users who clicked on the links. This statement could be expanded by discussing Twitter's justification for blocking these links to present a better-rounded understanding of the situation. In early August 2020, Twitter began blocking links to BitChute, labeling them as potentially harmful and unsafe. (sociable.co) (techtimes.com) However, Twitter did not provide a specific public explanation for this action, leading to debates about the reasons behind the block. Some observers speculated that the decision was due to concerns over the spread of misinformation and extremist content on BitChute. (bellingcat.com) A mention of the potential impact or criticisms regarding regulation efficiency for platforms like BitChute would provide depth to this point. While the new provision to Germany's Network Enforcement Act aimed to enhance accountability for hate speech, critics have questioned its effectiveness in addressing content on smaller platforms like BitChute, which remained unaffected. Some have argued that exempting such platforms creates loopholes that undermine the regulation's broader goals. Conversely, libertarian-conservative commentators have raised concerns that including smaller platforms could lead to overreach, stifling free speech and innovation. (codastory.com) (euractiv.com)

As of January 2021, BitChute was in the process of being reported to Ofcom by the Community Security Trust after discovering Holocaust denial and Holocaust glorification content on the website, among other content considered harmful by the charity such as conspiracy theories related to COVID-19. The trust's blog stated this will be an important test case for Ofcom's new role regarding regulation of social media in the United Kingdom, especially concerning extremism and hateful content. Also in January, BitChute added "incitement to hatred" to its list of prohibited content, using the definition from the United Kingdom's Audiovisual Media Services Regulations 2020, though Bellingcat wrote the following month that "racist slurs, Nazi imagery and calls for violence against Jews remained common in video comment sections." Including a response or clarification from BitChute regarding attempts to moderate such content would ensure a more comprehensive perspective.

In June 2023, Police Scotland launched an investigation into content published on BitChute that directed abuse and threats towards First Minister Humza Yousaf after receiving a complaint from his office. The content included several Red Ice videos featuring American white supremacist Lana Lokteff, one of which called for Yousaf to "go back" to Pakistan.

Content

Since launching, BitChute has accommodated far-right groups and individuals.Template:Efn The Southern Poverty Law Center wrote in 2019 that the site hosts "hate-fueled material", the Anti-Defamation League wrote in 2020 that "BitChute has become a hotbed for violent, conspiratorial and hate-filled video propaganda, and a recruiting ground for extremists", and Bellingcat wrote in 2021 that the platform was "rife with racism and hate speech". According to a 2020 report from anti-extremism group Hope not Hate, BitChute "actively promotes" content which was removed from other platforms as hate speech. Hope not Hate also documented videos hosted on BitChute supporting or produced by terrorist groups, including ISIS and the neo-Nazi groups National Action and Atomwaffen Division. A June 2020 report from British Jewish group Community Security Trust said that some terrorist videos had been on the site for over a year, and that BitChute only removes this content when forced to. Clarifying whether BitChute has taken any proactive steps or issued statements about these findings could ensure neutrality. Including perspectives from BitChute or its supporters advocating for free speech could provide balance here. An academic analysis published in July 2020 using a data set gathered in 2019 over five months found that BitChute had more hate speech than Gab, but less than 4chan. Providing context on how hate speech levels are assessed can help clarify this comparison. It found that only a small group of channels on the network had any meaningful engagement, almost all of which pushed conspiracy- and hate-laden content. Like the research from Hope not Hate, this analysis found content promoting the Atomwaffen Division posted to BitChute, including a recruitment video. The neo-Nazi propaganda film Europa: The Last Battle has been uploaded to multiple BitChute channels.

BitChute's founder Ray Vahey has described BitChute as "politically neutral". Hope Not Hate wrote in their 2020 report that "in actuality, the company chooses to almost exclusively promote content and producers that engage in hate speech and harmful misinformation" and that the "vile and dangerous content that abounds on BitChute is a result of deliberate decisions on the part of their founder and team". Bellingcat reported in 2021 that Vahey used the platform's Twitter account to promote antisemitic conspiracy theories, COVID-19 misinformation, and QAnon content.

BitChute is part of a group of "alt-tech" websites that position themselves as less strictly-moderated alternatives to mainstream social media platforms like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter. Deen Freelon and colleagues writing in Science characterised BitChute as among the alt-tech sites that are "dedicated to right-wing communities", and listed the site along with 4chan, 8chan, Parler, and Gab. Including a statement or perspective from right-wing users or advocates could balance this depiction of right-wing community dedication. They noted there are also more ideologically neutral alt-tech platforms, such as Discord and Telegram. Joe Mulhall of the UK anti-racism group Hope Not Hate has categorised BitChute among the "bespoke platforms" for the far-right, which he defines as platforms which were created by people who themselves have "far-right leanings". He distinguishes these from "co-opted platforms" such as DLive and Telegram, which were adopted by the far-right due to minimal moderation but not specifically created for their use.

Some creators who have been banned from YouTube or had their channels demonetised subsequently migrated to BitChute. The far-right conspiracy theory channel InfoWars migrated to BitChute after being banned by YouTube in 2018. Other creators maintain a presence on YouTube and on BitChute, and some post more extreme content on BitChute while using YouTube for less extreme material. Prominent far-right and alt-right video creators who have cross-posted to both YouTube and BitChute include Lauren Southern, Stefan Molyneux, Millennial Woes, and Paul Joseph Watson. Consider adding details of BitChute's response or policy changes regarding such content for a fuller picture.

The platform also hosts misinformation related to the COVID-19 pandemic. The conspiracy theory video Plandemic has been viewed on BitChute millions of times after having been removed from other platforms for spreading medically harmful misinformation.

Model

BitChute does not rely on advertising, and users can send payments to video creators directly. Since its launch, the site has promoted its use of the peer-to-peer technology WebTorrent as a means to decentralise hosting and reduce costs. It would be helpful to include detailed information about whether, despite the technological claims, users feel these goals are being met. BitChute allows creators to monetise the videos they publish on the platform by linking to fundraising websites including SubscribeStar, PayPal, and cryptocurrency processors. Although PayPal banned BitChute themselves from using their service, BitChute still links to PayPal pages for creators who choose to use them.

At launch, the site claimed it was using peer-to-peer WebTorrent technology. However, a November 2019 report by Fredrick Brennan, published in The Daily Dot, failed to find any evidence of peer-to-peer data transfer in BitChute's videos. All videos Brennan downloaded came directly from BitChute's servers, with no part of the videos received from peers. Clarifying whether Brennan's findings represent typical user experiences could provide a fuller understanding. According to Brennan, magnet links on the site do not work. Providing BitChute's response, if available, on the functioning of magnet links would enhance fairness. Brennan challenged BitChute's use of the word "delist" to describe deplatforming users, saying that the wording is misleading in that it makes BitChute seem falsely similar to BitTorrent (where a site maintains one "list" of content, but independent trackers may be created as well), when in reality BitChute is just deleting a user's videos from the BitChute site. Ray Vahey's or BitChute's reasoning for their specific terminology choice should be included for balance. According to Ars Technica in April 2021, the option to host videos using WebTorrent on BitChute "appears to have been deprecated".

See also

• Alt-tech
• Comparison of video hosting services
• List of online video platforms
• PeerTube